Civil Liberties

The 2006 case, United States v. J iodines, revisited a precise important issue that has been and continues to be difficult to tactic as the interpretation expected solitude constantly changes with our constantly changing world. In 2008 Antoine Jones was sentenced to life in prisons for conspiracy to distribute and to induce with intent to distribute quintuplet or much kilograms of cocain and 50 or more grams of cocaine base. The United States v. Knotts, on which the prosecutors relied, helped validate the hold of some(prenominal) of data obtained from the GPS tracking twist. In the appeal that resulted in bring up of Jones conviction, it argued that although, in Knotts,(a) psyche traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no liable expectation of hiding in his movements from one place to some other, this does not imply to movements whatsoever. In Knotts, the defendant was bring in from spotlight A to B (100 mile), whereas Jones was tracked 24 hours a sidereal day for 4 weeks. Because some costs deemed the use of a GPS tracking device not a depend  therefore not a violation of the fourth part amendment and the court of appeals did, immediate clarification was needed. In 2011 the US Supreme judiciary grant the petition for writ of Certiorari, which is a document that a losing party files with the Supreme cost asking the Supreme judicature to review the decision of a lower court. In this documents, it presented the question Whether the warrantless use of a tracking device on respondents vehicle to monitor its movements on public streets violated the fourth amendments.  \nTo protect citizens against electronic encroachment in places a one would consider private, the Harlans reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test was employed, booting show up the previous common- rightfulness pokeory test. This has created a path of opportunity for law enforcement to physically and technically trespass on ones property if deemed per son had no expectation of privacy . In summary, th...